ОПИСАНИЕ КЛАССА ВХОДНЫХ СИГНАЛОВ СИСТЕМЫ УПРАВЛЕНИЯ
Aннотация
В статье рассматривается метод определения класса входных сигналов линейной системы управления с непрерывным временем. Класс входных сигналов линейной системы управления с непрерывным временем описывается обыкновенным дифференциальным уравнением. Получена оценка установившейся ошибки управления. Приводится пример решения задачи.Ключевые слова: системы управления, входные сигналы, дифференциальное уравнение, установившаяся ошибка
К сожалению, текст статьи доступен только на Английском
Introduction
The quality of the synthesized control system depends on utilization of information about input signals. Therefore, the so-called absorption principle [7] in the automatic control theory is widespread. The absorption principle is built on class description of the input signals by homogeneous differential or difference equations with arbitrary initial conditions [1, 3–5, 8–11]. In this paper, the larger class of input signals of a continuous-time linear control system is specified by the stationary heterogeneous differential equation with arbitrary initial conditions and a restricted right member [2, 6]. This approach can be easily extended to discrete systems.
1. Statement of the problem
Let
, , (1)
be transfer functions corresponding to a desirable control system and a synthesized control system, where is a stable polynomial.
In this paper, we shall determine the signals class such that
(2)
here
, . (3)
2. Main results
Consider the error E(s) determined by (3). Using (1), we get
(4)
or
, (5)
where , , and
. (6)
We show that the input signals class is defined by the set of solutions of the linear differential equation
, , (7)
with arbitrary initial conditions and a piecewise continuous restricted right member, i.e.,
, . (8)
Here and is piecewise continuous. Next we define . The application of the Laplace transformation to equation (7) yields
, (9)
where L0 is a polynomial of degree m-1. Note that the Laplace transformation of the functions , and is existed. Combining (5) and (9), we obtain
. (10)
Since D(s) is the Hurwitz polynomial, it follows that
. (11)
Here
(12)
is a transient components of the error ε(t). We can therefore write
. (13)
Let us consider now a steady-state components
(14)
— of the error ε(t). Let
, , , . (15)
Then
, (16)
where
. (17)
By the convolution theorem, we have
. (18)
Taking into account (8), we get
. (19)
It can easily be checked that
. (20)
Finally, we obviously obtain the estimate
, (21)
where cij is given by (17) and
. (22)
Combining (21) and (13), we get the following proposition:
. (23)
Let and
. (24)
Thus proposition (2) is executed for the input signals satisfying conditions (7), (8), and (24).
Notice that relationships (17) and (22) indicate the practical methods for the decrease of the steasy-state error. If , then the steady-state error is equal to 0.
3. Example
Let us consider
, , . (25)
Therefore,
, . (26)
From (22), we obtain . Thus the signals class is defined by the following conditions:
, (27)
. (28)
This implies that
, . (29)
Clearly, algebraic polynomials of degree 1, trigonometric polynomials, decreasing exponents, and logarithmic functions belong to the selected class . Note also that the class are not exhausted the listed functions.
Let us consider now
, . (30)
Hence,
, . (31)
Using (22), we get . Consequently the signals class is determined by the equation
, , (32)
where
. (33)
If , then the element with transfer function (30) realizes the asymptotically fine noise-proof differentiating of amplitude modulated signals
. (34)
Список литературы
Список использованной литературы появится позже.