<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2518-1092</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research result. Information technologies</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2518-1092</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2518-1092-2026-11-2-0-9</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">4259</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND DECISION MAKING</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>&lt;strong&gt;OPTIMIZATION OF HYPERPARAMETERS OF MACHINE LEARNING MODELS BASED ON EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS AND SURROGATE MODELING&lt;/strong&gt;</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>&lt;strong&gt;OPTIMIZATION OF HYPERPARAMETERS OF MACHINE LEARNING MODELS BASED ON EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS AND SURROGATE MODELING&lt;/strong&gt;</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Zaripov</surname><given-names>Evgeny Andreevich</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Zaripov</surname><given-names>Evgeny Andreevich</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>e.a.zaripov@ya.ru</email></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Lazarenko</surname><given-names>Sergey Alexandrovich</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Lazarenko</surname><given-names>Sergey Alexandrovich</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>sergey.lazarenko.0241@mail.ru</email></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/information/2026/2/ИТ.НР_11_2_9.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Relevance. Building high-precision predictive models in modern intelligent systems requires automating the search for optimal hyperparameters. Traditional optimization methods demonstrate low efficiency in high-dimensional spaces and with significant computational costs for estimating the objective function, which necessitates the development of new approaches at the interface of heuristic search and statistical approximation.

Problem. The main difficulty lies in the need to find the global extremum of the &amp;laquo;black box&amp;raquo; function with a strict limitation of the computing budget. The high resource intensity of each access to the complete machine learning model requires minimizing the number of iterations without losing the accuracy and robustness of the final solution.

Methods. A hybrid EA-SM algorithm is proposed that integrates the mechanisms of evolutionary search and adaptive surrogate modeling based on Gaussian processes. The mathematical apparatus includes the use of a data collection function to balance space exploration and exploit the found minima, as well as Tikhonov regularization to ensure the computational stability of covariance matrices.

Results. Experimental verification on the tasks of stochastic object classification and time series forecasting (AutoForecast, Chronos) confirmed the superiority of the method. A reduction in the number of calls to the objective function by 30-70% has been found compared to the DIRECT and Optuna algorithms, while maintaining high approximation accuracy in the vicinity of extremes.

Conclusions. The developed approach provides asymptotic convergence to the global optimum and resistance to stochastic noise. The algorithm is suitable for configuring neural network architectures in high-dimensional environments, minimizing time and hardware costs in monitoring and anomaly detection systems.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Relevance. Building high-precision predictive models in modern intelligent systems requires automating the search for optimal hyperparameters. Traditional optimization methods demonstrate low efficiency in high-dimensional spaces and with significant computational costs for estimating the objective function, which necessitates the development of new approaches at the interface of heuristic search and statistical approximation.

Problem. The main difficulty lies in the need to find the global extremum of the &amp;laquo;black box&amp;raquo; function with a strict limitation of the computing budget. The high resource intensity of each access to the complete machine learning model requires minimizing the number of iterations without losing the accuracy and robustness of the final solution.

Methods. A hybrid EA-SM algorithm is proposed that integrates the mechanisms of evolutionary search and adaptive surrogate modeling based on Gaussian processes. The mathematical apparatus includes the use of a data collection function to balance space exploration and exploit the found minima, as well as Tikhonov regularization to ensure the computational stability of covariance matrices.

Results. Experimental verification on the tasks of stochastic object classification and time series forecasting (AutoForecast, Chronos) confirmed the superiority of the method. A reduction in the number of calls to the objective function by 30-70% has been found compared to the DIRECT and Optuna algorithms, while maintaining high approximation accuracy in the vicinity of extremes.

Conclusions. The developed approach provides asymptotic convergence to the global optimum and resistance to stochastic noise. The algorithm is suitable for configuring neural network architectures in high-dimensional environments, minimizing time and hardware costs in monitoring and anomaly detection systems.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>hyperparameter optimization</kwd><kwd>evolutionary algorithms</kwd><kwd>surrogate modeling</kwd><kwd>Gaussian processes</kwd><kwd>active learning</kwd><kwd>machine learning</kwd><kwd>global extremum</kwd><kwd>computational efficiency</kwd><kwd>time series</kwd><kwd>automated machine learning</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>hyperparameter optimization</kwd><kwd>evolutionary algorithms</kwd><kwd>surrogate modeling</kwd><kwd>Gaussian processes</kwd><kwd>active learning</kwd><kwd>machine learning</kwd><kwd>global extremum</kwd><kwd>computational efficiency</kwd><kwd>time series</kwd><kwd>automated machine learning</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>1. Akopov A.S. Modeling and Optimization of Individual Decision-Making Strategies in Multi-Agent Socio-Economic Systems Using Machine Learning // Business Informatics. 2023. Vol. 17. No. 2. pp. 7&amp;ndash;19.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>2. Anafiyev A.S., Karyuk A.S. Review of Approaches to Solving the Problem of Hyperparameter Optimization for Machine Learning Algorithms // Tavricheskiy Vestnik Informatics and Mathematics. 2022. No.&amp;nbsp;2(55). pp. 30-37.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>3. Gorbunov S.M., Stanovov V.V. Evolutionary Algorithm for Multicriteria Optimization with Surrogate Machine Learning Models // Bulletin of the Bauman Moscow State Technical University. Series &amp;laquo;Instrument Engineering&amp;raquo;. 2025. No. 2 (151). pp. 48&amp;ndash;62.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>4. Kleiner S.G. Study of the accuracy of the solution of the hyperparameter optimization problem using a neural network // Vestnik nauki. 2025. Vol. 3. No. 6 (87). Pp. 1785&amp;ndash;1791.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>5. Matveev A.N. Tools for constructing machine learning models // E-Scio. 2023. No. 6 (81). Pp. 71&amp;ndash;77.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>6. Timofeev A.V. Method for selecting hyperparameters in machine learning problems for classifying stochastic objects // Scientific and Technical Bulletin of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics. 2020. Vol. 20. No. 5. Pp. 667&amp;ndash;676.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>7. Trunov E. E. Algorithm for detecting anomalous behavior of users of automated systems based on machine learning methods // Bulletin of Astrakhan State Technical University. Series: Control, Computer Engineering, and Informatics. 2025. No. 4. pp. 33&amp;ndash;42.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>8. Usova M. A., Lebedev I. G., Shtanyuk A. A., Barkalov K. A. A global optimization algorithm for tuning hyperparameters of machine learning methods // Problems of Informatics. 2025. No. 4 (69). pp. 52&amp;ndash;72.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>9. Khodorchenko M. A., Butakov N. A., Nasonov D. A., Firulik M. Yu. A software framework for optimizing hyperparameters of topic models with additive regularization // Scientific and Technical Bulletin of Information Technologies, Mechanics, and Optics. 2023. Vol. 23. No. 1. pp. 112&amp;ndash;120.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>10. Abdallah M. AutoForecast: Automatic Time-Series Forecasting Model Selection // Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Information &amp;amp; Knowledge Management (CIKM &amp;rsquo;22). 2022. P. 5&amp;ndash;14.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>11. Akiba T., Sano S., Yanase T., Ohta T., Koyama M. Optuna: A Next-Generation Hyperparameter Optimization Framework // Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery &amp;amp; Data Mining. 2019. P. 2623&amp;ndash;2631.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><mixed-citation>12. Ansari A.F. Chronos: Learning the Language of Time Series // arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.07815. 2024. / Christ M. Time Series Feature Extraction on basis of Scalable Hypothesis tests (tsfresh &amp;ndash; A Python package) // Neurocomputing. 2018. Т. 307. P. 72&amp;ndash;77.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><mixed-citation>13. Audet C., Batailly A., Kojtych S. Escaping unknown discontinuous regions in blackbox optimization // SIAM Journal on Optimization. 2022. Т. 32. № 3. P. 1843&amp;ndash;1870.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><mixed-citation>14. Candelieri A. Sequential model based optimization of partially defined functions under unknown constraints // Journal of Global Optimization. 2019. Т. 73. № 2. P. 281&amp;ndash;303.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><mixed-citation>15. Conrad F. AutoML Applied to Time Series Analysis Tasks in Production Engineering // Procedia Computer Science. 2024. Т. 232. P. 849&amp;ndash;860.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><mixed-citation>16. Filippou K., Aifantis G., Papakostas G.A., Tsekouras G.E. Structure learning and hyperparameter optimization using an automated machine learning (AutoML) pipeline // Information. 2023. Т. 14. № 4. P. 232.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><mixed-citation>17. Paulavicius R., Sergeyev Y.D., Kvasov D.E., Zilinskas J. Globally-biased BIRECT algorithm with local accelerators for expensive global optimization // Expert Systems with Applications. 2020. Т. 144. P. 113052.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><mixed-citation>18. Sergeyev Y.D., Kvasov D.E., Mukhametzhanov M.S. On the efficiency of nature-inspired metaheuristics in expensive global optimization with limited budget // Scientific Reports. 2018. Т. 8. № 1. P. 453.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><mixed-citation>19. Stripinis L., Paulavicius R. A new DIRECT-GLh algorithm for global optimization with hidden constraints&amp;nbsp;// Optimization Letters. 2021. Т. 15. № 6. P. 1865&amp;ndash;1884.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><mixed-citation>20. Sun Y., Yen G., Yi Z. IGD indicator-based evolutionary algorithm for manyobjective optimization problems&amp;nbsp;// IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation. 2019. Т. 23. № 2. P. 173&amp;ndash;187.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><mixed-citation>21. Truong A. Towards Automated Machine Learning: Evaluation and Comparison of AutoML Approaches and Tools // 2019 IEEE 31st International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI). 2019.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><mixed-citation>P. 1471&amp;ndash;1479.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><mixed-citation>22. Wang H., Jin Y., Doherty J. Committee-based active learning for surrogate-assisted particle swarm optimization of expensive problems // IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics. 2017. Т. 47. № 9. P. 2664&amp;ndash;2677.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><mixed-citation>23. Waring J., Lindvall C., Umeton R. Automated machine learning: Review of the state-of-the-art and opportunities for healthcare // Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. 2020. Т. 104. P. 101822.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><mixed-citation>24. Xu N. Time Series Analysis on Monthly Beer Production in Australia // Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology. 2024. Т. 94. P. 392&amp;ndash;401.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>