2518-1092Research result. Information technologies2518-109210.18413/2518-1092-2021-6-1-0-12370INFORMATION SYSTEM AND TECHNOLOGIESHARDWARE AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES IN REHABILITATION OF POST-STROKE PATIENTSHARDWARE AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES IN REHABILITATION OF POST-STROKE PATIENTSUshakovDmitry IgorevichUshakovDmitry Igorevichushakov_d@bsu.edu.ruKamyshnikovaLyudmila A.KamyshnikovaLyudmila A.kamyshnikova@bsu.edu.ruAleinikovAndrey YurievichAleinikovAndrey Yurievichaleinikov@bsu.edu.ruPavlovaYulia StanislavovnaPavlovaYulia Stanislavovnapavlova_yus@bsu.edu.ruRachinskySergey AndreevichRachinskySergey Andreevich677110@bsu.edu.ruKhudasovaOlga Gennad'yevnaKhudasovaOlga Gennad'yevnahudasova_og@bsu.edu.ru20216100

The use of hardware and software technologies in medicine has developed significantly over the past two decades thanks to such advances as the exoskeleton and bioengineering. One of the methods for restoring the function of the upper extremities of post-stroke patients is motor rehabilitation with the help of robotic devices, which have become an essential addition to the traditional post-stroke rehabilitation. In this review, we examined the modern literature on hardware and software systems, taking into account their design features for upper limb rehabilitation, in order to further help developers make the right choice among hardware components and contribute to the development and improvement of robotics for hand rehabilitation in patients with stroke. In our opinion, robotic rehabilitation is one of the most promising areas of rehabilitation.

The use of hardware and software technologies in medicine has developed significantly over the past two decades thanks to such advances as the exoskeleton and bioengineering. One of the methods for restoring the function of the upper extremities of post-stroke patients is motor rehabilitation with the help of robotic devices, which have become an essential addition to the traditional post-stroke rehabilitation. In this review, we examined the modern literature on hardware and software systems, taking into account their design features for upper limb rehabilitation, in order to further help developers make the right choice among hardware components and contribute to the development and improvement of robotics for hand rehabilitation in patients with stroke. In our opinion, robotic rehabilitation is one of the most promising areas of rehabilitation.

hardware and software complexexoskeletonrobotic devicesrehabilitationstrokehardware and software complexexoskeletonrobotic devicesrehabilitationstrokeСписок литературыHealth care in Russia 2019: Stat.sb. / Rosstat. – M., 2019. URL: https://rosstat.gov.ru/storage/mediabank/Zdravoohran-2019.pdf. (date of access:12.01.2021).Sitnikova M.A., Afonin A.N., Aleinikov A.Yu., Gladyshev A.R., Popova A.V. Using a mobile robot for interactive learning to count using a number line // Fundamental Research. – 2017. – No. 5; URL: http://www.fundamental-research.ru/ru/article/view?id=41510 (date of access: 13.06.2017).Frolov A.A., Kozlovskaia I.B., Biryukova E.V., Bobrov P.D. Robotic devices in poststroke rehabilitation // Journal of Higher Nervous Activity I.P. Pavlov. – 2017. – No 4. – Р. 394-413.Ushakov D.I. On the possibility of increasing the stability of signals with OFDM on the effect of carrier frequency jitter // Information systems and technologies. – 2014. – No 4(84). – P. 118-125.Barsotti M., Leonardis D., Loconsole C., Solazzi M. A full upper limb robotic exoskeleton for reaching and grasping rehabilitation triggered by MI-BCI // International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, Singapore, Singapore, August 2015.Ben-Tzvi P., Ma Z. Sensing and force-feedback exoskeleton (SAFE) robotic glove // IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering. – 2015. – Vol. 23. – № 6. – P. 992-1002.Bos R.A., Haarman C.J.W., Stortelder T. A structured overview of trends and technologies used in dynamic hand orthoses // Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation. – 2016. – Vol. 13. – № 1. – P. 1-25.Chiri A., Giovacchini F., Vitiello N. et al. HANDEXOS: towards an exoskeleton device for the rehabilitation of the hand // IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. – 2009. – P. 1106-1111.Dovat L., O. Lambercy, R. Gassert et al. HandСare: a cable-actuated rehabilitation system to train hand function after stroke // IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering. – 2008. – Vol. 16. – No 6. – P. 582.Hu X.L., Tong K.Y., Wei X.J., Rong W., Susanto E.A., Ho S.K. Coordinated upper limb training assisted with an electromyography (EMG)-driven hand robot after stroke // Conference Proceedings: Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. – 2013. – Vol. 2013 – P. 5903-5906.In H.К, Cho K.J., Kim K., Lee B. Jointless structure and under-actuation mechanism for compact hand exoskeleton // IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics. 2011. – Vol. 2011. – Аrticle 5975394.In H.K., Cho K.J. Evaluation of the antagonistic tendon driven system for SNU Exo-Glove // International Conference on Ubiquitous Robots and Ambient Intelligence. – 2013. – Vol. 60. – P. 507-509.Kinetic Muscles Inc. Hand physical therapy with the HandMentorTM. – 2017. URL: http://www.kineticmuscles.com/hand-physicaltherapy-hand-mentor.html (date of access:12.01.2021).Koumpouros Y. A systematic review on existing measures for the subjective assessment of rehabilitation and assistive robot devices // Journal of Healthcare Engineering. – 2016. –Vol. 2016. – No 4. – P. 171.Narayan J., Kalita B., Dwivedy S.K. Development of Robot-Based Upper Limb Devices for Rehabilitation Purposes: a Systematic Review // Augment Hum Res. 6. – 2021. – 4. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41133-020-00043-x (date of access:12.01.2021).Pinter D., Pegritz S., Pargfrieder C. et al. Exploratory study on the effects of a robotic hand rehabilitation device on changes in grip strength and brain activity after stroke // Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation. – 2013. –Vol. 20. – №. 4. – P. 308.Polygerinos P., Wang Z., Galloway K.C., Wood R.J., Walsh C.J. Soft robotic glove for combined assistance and at-home rehabilitation // Robotics and Autonomous Systems. – 2014. – Vol. 73. – Р. 135-143.Rahman A., Al-Jumaily A. Design and development of a bilateral therapeutic hand device for stroke rehabilitation // International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems. – 2013. – Vol. 10. – № 12. – P. 405.Rong W., Tong K.Y., Hu X.L., Ho N.S.K. Combined electromyography (EMG)-driven robotic system with functional electrical stimulation (FES) for rehabilitation // Northeast Bioengineering Conference. – 2012. – Vol. 10. –P. 313-314.Sasaki D., Noritsugu T., Takaiwa M. Development of active support splint driven by pneumatic soft actuator (ASSIST) // IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. – 2006. – P. 520–525.Tang Z.J., Sugano S., Iwata H. Design of an MRI compatible robot for finger rehabilitation // International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation. – 2012. – P. 611-616.Ushakov D.I., Starovoit I.A. On a method of formation of signals with high spectral efficiency for cognitive radio communication system // Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology. – 2015. – Vol. 80. – No 3. – P. 409-418.Wege A., Zimmermann A. Electromyography sensor based control for a hand exoskeleton // IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics. – 2007. – P. 1470-1475.Whitney J.P., Glisson M.F., Brockmeyer E.L., Hodgins J.K. A low-friction passive fluid transmission and fluid-tendon soft actuator // IEEE/rsj International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. – 2014. – P. 2801-2808.Yue Z., Zhang X., Wang J. Hand Rehabilitation Robotics on Poststroke Motor Recovery // Behavioural Neurology. – 2017. – Vol. 2017. URL. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3908135 (date of access:12.01.2021).