<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2518-1092</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Research result. Information technologies</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2518-1092</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18413/2518-1092-2019-4-2-0-5</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">1702</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND PROCESSING OF KNOWLEDGE</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>COMPUTER TRAINING PROGRAMMS</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>COMPUTER TRAINING PROGRAMMS</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Nikolsky</surname><given-names>Pavel Gennadyevich</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Nikolsky</surname><given-names>Pavel Gennadyevich</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>pavlusha.golova@gmail.com</email></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Kuznetsov</surname><given-names>Andrey Viktorovich</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Kuznetsov</surname><given-names>Andrey Viktorovich</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>kvaa77@mail.ru</email></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Arhipov</surname><given-names>Sergei Nikolaevich</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Arhipov</surname><given-names>Sergei Nikolaevich</given-names></name></name-alternatives></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Chistykov</surname><given-names>Sergey Vladimirovich</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Chistykov</surname><given-names>Sergey Vladimirovich</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>chis_serg@mail.ru</email></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="epub"><year>2019</year></pub-date><volume>4</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>0</fpage><lpage>0</lpage><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="/media/information/2019/2/ИТ_6.pdf" /><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>In the context of technological progress, it is very difficult to train a telecommunications specialist who fully possesses the knowledge and skills to operate all the equipment operated by him. It is caused by continuous improvement and updating of samples of communication equipment. One of the ways to solve this problem is computer training programs that allow to individualize the learning process while maintaining its quality. In connection with the large role in the modern process of education to computer training programs have a number of requirements: the presence of the educational goal, the correct selection of educational material, accessible interface, etc. The main advantages of computer training programs are the ability to self-study and self-control, concentration in one place of materials of different nature and easy access to them, reducing the cost of teaching and replication of printed materials. The disadvantages include the need to have basic computer skills, low interactivity and difficulty in perceiving large amounts of information from the display screen. Today, there are a large number of computer training programs with different goals and objectives, which caused the need to classify them. Readiness for use, solved pedagogical tasks and novelty of educational material are often considered as classification features. The article also provides an example of a computer training program, with the help of which the basic requirements and classification features are considered in more detail.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>In the context of technological progress, it is very difficult to train a telecommunications specialist who fully possesses the knowledge and skills to operate all the equipment operated by him. It is caused by continuous improvement and updating of samples of communication equipment. One of the ways to solve this problem is computer training programs that allow to individualize the learning process while maintaining its quality. In connection with the large role in the modern process of education to computer training programs have a number of requirements: the presence of the educational goal, the correct selection of educational material, accessible interface, etc. The main advantages of computer training programs are the ability to self-study and self-control, concentration in one place of materials of different nature and easy access to them, reducing the cost of teaching and replication of printed materials. The disadvantages include the need to have basic computer skills, low interactivity and difficulty in perceiving large amounts of information from the display screen. Today, there are a large number of computer training programs with different goals and objectives, which caused the need to classify them. Readiness for use, solved pedagogical tasks and novelty of educational material are often considered as classification features. The article also provides an example of a computer training program, with the help of which the basic requirements and classification features are considered in more detail.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>computer training programs</kwd><kwd>software</kwd><kwd>educational material</kwd><kwd>educational process</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>computer training programs</kwd><kwd>software</kwd><kwd>educational material</kwd><kwd>educational process</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>Список литературы</title><ref id="B1"><mixed-citation>1. Kruglikov G. I. Didactic means in the classroom technology // School and production.1999. №4.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><mixed-citation>Page 3-12.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><mixed-citation>2. Safrin Y. A. Information technology / Moscow Laboratory of Basic Knowledge.1999.I part. pp. 21-24.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><mixed-citation>3. Kodzhaspirova G. M. Technical training and methods of their application/ ACADEM A. 2001. P. 12.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><mixed-citation>4. Romankova A. A. Information technologies in education / Romankova A.A., Titova E. I. // Young scientist. March 2015. Issue № 6. pp. 677-679.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><mixed-citation>5. Kupriyanov M. V. Didactic Toolkit of new educational technologies // Higher education in Russia. 2001.№ 3. pp. 124-126.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><mixed-citation>6. Tikhomirov V. A. Quality of education in virtual environment: computer technologies in education / Tikhomirov V. A., Rubin Y. M., Samoilov V. D. // Higher education in Russia.1999. № 6. pp. 21-25.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><mixed-citation>7. Kiselev G. M. Information technologies in pedagogical education / Kiselev G. M., Bochkova R.V. // Moscow Publishing and trading Corporation &amp;quot;Dashkov and K&amp;quot;.2014. pp. 37-41.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><mixed-citation>8. Dendev B. Information and communication technologies in education // M.: UNESCO IITE.2013. pp. 79-83.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><mixed-citation>9. Andreev A. A. Pedagogy of higher school // M.: MESI. 2000. pp. 287-292.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><mixed-citation>10.&amp;nbsp; Mashbits E. I. Psychological and pedagogical bases of a problem of computerization of training // M.: Pedagogics. 1988. pp.2-10.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>