2518-1092Research result. Information technologies2518-109210.18413/2518-1092-2017-2-3-38-441165SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND PROCESSING OF KNOWLEDGEEFFICIENCY ESTIMATION TECHNIQUE FOR MULTIMEDIA DATA TRANSMISSIONEFFICIENCY ESTIMATION TECHNIQUE FOR MULTIMEDIA DATA TRANSMISSIONRyndinArtem ValerevichRyndinArtem Valerevichartem_ryndin@mail.ruPakulovaEkaterina AnatolievnaPakulovaEkaterina Anatolievnaepakulova@sfedu.ru20172300

In the present work, we develop the efficiency estimation technique for multimedia data transmission, which is based on the common analysis of Quality of Service (QoS) and Quality of Experience (QoE) parameters. The proposed technique demands the full set of information of initial multimedia sequence. The main feature of the proposed technique is the absence of contraction of several parameters of efficiency because of the complexity of the interpretation of the common efficiency value. The considered in this work efficiency parameters are equal. In this work, it is proposed to use the following parameters for efficiency estimation of multimedia data transmission: playback interruptions, round-trip time, jitter, video quality evaluation metric in terms of PSNR and video quality transitions.

In the present work, we develop the efficiency estimation technique for multimedia data transmission, which is based on the common analysis of Quality of Service (QoS) and Quality of Experience (QoE) parameters. The proposed technique demands the full set of information of initial multimedia sequence. The main feature of the proposed technique is the absence of contraction of several parameters of efficiency because of the complexity of the interpretation of the common efficiency value. The considered in this work efficiency parameters are equal. In this work, it is proposed to use the following parameters for efficiency estimation of multimedia data transmission: playback interruptions, round-trip time, jitter, video quality evaluation metric in terms of PSNR and video quality transitions.

Efficiency estimationmultimedia dataQuality of ServiceQuality of ExperienceEfficiency estimationmultimedia dataQuality of ServiceQuality of ExperienceСписок литературыBalachandran A. et al. A quest for an internet video quality-of-experience metric // Proceedings of the 11th ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks. – ACM, 2012. – С. 97-102.Clark A. D. et al. Modeling the effects of burst packet loss and recency on subjective voice quality. – 2001.Huynh-Thu Q., Ghanbari M. Scope of validity of PSNR in image/video quality assessment / Q. Huynh-Thu, M. Ghanbari // Electronics letters. – 2008. – Т. 44. – №. 13. – С. 800-801.”A Service-Oriented Framework of Distributed QoS Measurement Based on Multi-Agent for Overlay Network” / Jian-ren,Y., Rui-min H., Jun C., Jian-bo Z.: Feb 2009. С. 158 –162.Koistinen T. Protocol overview: RTP and RTCP //Nokia Telecommunications. 2000.Lin C. H. et al. The packet loss effect on MPEG video transmission in wireless networks //20th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications-Volume 1 (AINA'06). IEEE, 2006. Т. 1. С. 565-572.Loguinov D., Radha H. End-to-end internet video traffic dynamics: Statistical study and analysis //INFOCOM 2002. Twenty-First Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies. Proceedings. IEEE. 2002. Т. 2. С. 723-732.Minhas T. N.  and Fiedler M. Impact of disturbance locations on video quality of experience. In Quality of Experience for Multimedia Content Sharing, EuroITV2011, June 2011.Minhas T. N. et al. Mobile video sensitivity to packet loss and packet delay variation in terms of QoE //2012 19th International Packet Video Workshop (PV). IEEE, 2012. С. 83-88.Minhas T. N. Network impact on quality of experience of mobile video. 2012.Nam H., Kim K. H., Schulzrinne H. QoE Matters More Than QoS: Why People Stop Watching Cat Videos // INFOCOM, 2016 (to appear). 2016.Pakulova E., Miller K., Wolisz A. Adaptive low-delay video streaming in heterogeneous wireless networks using MPRTP // Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC), 2017 13th International. –IEEE, 2017.  С. 14-19.Piamrat K. et al. Quality of experience measurements for video streaming over wireless networks //Information Technology: New Generations, 2009. ITNG'09. Sixth International Conference on. IEEE, 2009. С. 1184-1189.Factors Influencing Quality of Experience. In Quality of Experience / Reiter U., Brunnstr¨ K., Katrien De Moor, Larabi M.C., Pereira M., Pinheiro A., You J., and Zgank A., Springer International Publishing. 2014. C 55–74.Serral-Gracià R. et al. An overview of quality of experience measurement challenges for video applications in IP networks // International Conference on Wired/Wireless Internet Communications. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010. С. 252-263.Singh V., Ahsan A. and Ott J.: MPRTP: Multipath Considerations for Real-time Media. MMSys’13, Proceedings of the 4th ACM Multimedia Systems Conference, February 26-March 1, 2013, C.190-201.Akulova E. A. Algorithms and software for improving the efficiency of transmission of multimedia data in wireless computer networks: Dis.Cand.tech.Sciences. Saint Petersburg, 2016. 116с.Akulova E. A. Distribution and adaptation of the video stream in SVC format in heterogeneous networks // Scientific and technical journal of information technologies, mechanics and optics. 2016. T. 16. No. 4. P. 710-715. doi: 10.17586/2226-1494-2016-16-4-710-715.Sagatov E. S., Sukhov, A. M. improving the quality of Internet video streams by the method of duplication of key frames / Sagatov E. S., Sukhov, A. M. // Vestnik of Samara state aerospace University. Academician S. P. Korolev (National research University). 2011. no. 2.